Includes bibliographical references and index.

Introduction: history of the euthanasia debate -- Point: states have a duty to protect life in all forms -- Counterpoint: end-of-life decisions are personal matters -- Point: without clear evidence of intent, life support should be administered -- Counterpoint: the state should not intervene to keep people on life support -- Point: state bans on physician-assisted suicide protect life -- Counterpoint: state bans on physician-assisted suicide prolong suffering -- Conclusion: the future of the euthanasia debate.